1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (211 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Audi A5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 2010 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ2A | A5 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 211 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4625 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1382 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2751 mm |
