1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2013 Audi A7
To start off, 2013 Audi A7 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Audi A7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A7 (414 HP) has 355 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A7 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A7 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A7 (549 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2013 Audi A7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 2013 Audi A7 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ2A | A7 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | single |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 414 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 549 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2139 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1408 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2914 mm |
