1949 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 216 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ3A | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | CJ3A | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |