1949 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1992 Lada Samara
To start off, 1992 Lada Samara is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Lada Samara (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 190 kg more than 1992 Lada Samara.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ3A | 1992 Lada Samara | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ3A | Samara |
Year Released | 1949 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2470 mm |