1949 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 460 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ3A | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Jeep | MCC |
| Model | CJ3A | Smart |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
