1949 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 341 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ3A | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | CJ3A | C30 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |
