1949 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (291 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 940 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (317 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ3A | 2013 Lexus RX | |
Make | Jeep | Lexus |
Model | CJ3A | RX |
Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 291 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 317 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2740 mm |