1949 Jeep Jeepster vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep Jeepster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep Jeepster would be higher. At 2,429 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Jeep Jeepster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep Jeepster weights approximately 441 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1949 Jeep Jeepster is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep Jeepster will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep Jeepster (157 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep Jeepster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep Jeepster | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Jeep | MCC |
| Model | Jeepster | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1810 mm |
