1949 Land Rover I vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Land Rover I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Land Rover I would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1949 Land Rover I. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Land Rover I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Land Rover I | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Land Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | I | CTS |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
