1949 Maserati A6G vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (120 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo V40 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Maserati A6G | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | A6G | V40 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1280 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2560 mm |