1949 Maserati A6G vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (222 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 855 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Maserati A6G | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Maserati | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A6G | CLK |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
