1949 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 744 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Maserati A6G | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Maserati | Volkswagen |
| Model | A6G | Eos |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1619 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2578 mm |
