1949 Maserati A6G vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,488 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Smart Fortwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Smart Fortwo should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Maserati A6G weights approximately 35 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1949 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1949 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Maserati A6G | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Maserati | Smart |
Model | A6G | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1867 mm |