1949 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 946 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Maserati A6GCS | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | A6GCS | S60 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1566 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2670 mm |