1949 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 949 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Maserati A6GCS | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6GCS | S60 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1569 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2720 mm |
