1949 Maserati A6GCS vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 983 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Maserati A6GCS | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Maserati | Ford |
| Model | A6GCS | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1603 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2720 mm |
