1949 MG TD vs. 1996 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Toyota Celica is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 MG TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 MG TD would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1949 MG TD. (53 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1949 MG TD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Celica weights approximately 219 kg more than 1949 MG TD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 MG TD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 MG TD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 MG TD. (87 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 MG TD.
Compare all specifications:
1949 MG TD | 1996 Toyota Celica | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | TD | Celica |
Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1250 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |