1949 Renault Juva vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (63 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1949 Renault Juva. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1949 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 350 kg more than 1949 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Renault Juva | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
Model | Juva | Polo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 63 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2470 mm |