1949 Renault Juva vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (168 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1949 Renault Juva. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 689 kg more than 1949 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Renault Juva | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Juva | 6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2790 mm |