1949 Riley RM A vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 233 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1949 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1949 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Riley RM A | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Riley | Honda |
| Model | RM A | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1468 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2640 mm |
