1949 Riley RM A vs. 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 140 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Riley RM A | 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | FJ Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 239 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |
