1949 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 610 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva has automatic transmission and 1949 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1949 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Riley RM A | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Riley | Chevrolet |
Model | RM A | Captiva |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |