1949 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Riley RM A | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Riley | Nissan |
Model | RM A | Pixo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2360 mm |