1949 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2013 Subaru Forester is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Forester weights approximately 293 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Riley RM A | 2013 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Riley | Subaru |
Model | RM A | Forester |
Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2006 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2615 mm |