1949 Simca 8 vs. 1962 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 1962 Sunbeam Alpine is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Sunbeam Alpine (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1949 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Sunbeam Alpine should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Sunbeam Alpine weights approximately 75 kg more than 1949 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Simca 8 | 1962 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | Simca | Sunbeam |
| Model | 8 | Alpine |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2190 mm |
