1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Triumph 2000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Simca | Triumph |
| Model | Type 11 Monoplace | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 420 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2700 mm |
