1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 1972 Volvo 164 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 164 (156 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 164 weights approximately 940 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Simca | Volvo |
| Model | Type 11 Monoplace | 164 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 2978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 420 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2730 mm |
