1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace vs. 2004 Volvo V40
To start off, 2004 Volvo V40 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V40 (169 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V40 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | 2004 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Simca | Volvo |
| Model | Type 11 Monoplace | V40 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 420 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2570 mm |
