1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1685 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Simca | Toyota |
Model | Type 11 Monoplace | Highlander |
Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 420 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2789 mm |