1949 Talbot Saoutchik vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 84 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1949 Talbot Saoutchik has manual transmission. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Talbot Saoutchik | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Talbot | Jeep |
Model | Saoutchik | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 4480 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1716 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2700 mm |