1949 Triumph Mayflower vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Mayflower.
Because 1949 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Triumph Mayflower | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Triumph | Holden |
Model | Mayflower | Epica |
Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |