1949 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1949 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1949 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Volvo PV 60 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Volvo | Toyota |
| Model | PV 60 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2601 mm |
