1949 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (104 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Volvo PV 60 | 2012 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Volvo | Audi |
| Model | PV 60 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
