1950 AC 2-Litre vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 1964 DKW Munga is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 AC 2-Litre (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 AC 2-Litre should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 AC 2-Litre weights approximately 216 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 AC 2-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 AC 2-Litre | 1964 DKW Munga | |
Make | AC | DKW |
Model | 2-Litre | Munga |
Year Released | 1950 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 31 L |