1950 AC 2-Litre vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1950 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1950 AC 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 AC 2-Litre weights approximately 386 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 AC 2-Litre (136 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1950 AC 2-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 AC 2-Litre | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | 2-Litre | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 57 L |
