1950 AC 2-Litre vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 3,309 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (230 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1950 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1950 AC 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 355 kg more than 1950 AC 2-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (314 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 AC 2-Litre. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 AC 2-Litre | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | 2-Litre | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3309 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1681 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 73 L |
