1950 AC 2-Litre vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 AC 2-Litre would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 AC 2-Litre weights approximately 141 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 AC 2-Litre. (136 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1950 AC 2-Litre | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | AC | Mini |
Model | 2-Litre | Cooper |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 50 L |