1950 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 200 kg more than 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 1900 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 221 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |