1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1950 Austin A 40
To start off, both 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C and 1950 Austin A 40 were released in the same year (1950). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 410 kg more than 1950 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1950 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 6C | A 40 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 34 L |