1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1958 Alpine A 106
To start off, 1958 Alpine A 106 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1958 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1958 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1958 Alpine A 106 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
| Model | 6C | A 106 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 904 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 28 L |
