1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 290 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1972 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | RX-4 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |