1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | 140 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 60 L |