1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri
To start off, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri weights approximately 100 kg more than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1976 BMW Karmann Asso di Quadri | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | 6C | Karmann Asso di Quadri |
Year Released | 1950 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |