1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 194 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 6C | E |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |