1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1984 Subaru Rex
To start off, 1984 Subaru Rex is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 790 kg more than 1984 Subaru Rex.
Because 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Subaru Rex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1984 Subaru Rex | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
Model | 6C | Rex |
Year Released | 1950 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 55.6 mm |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 140 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 32 L |