1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | 6C | Lancer |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 276 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 50 L |