1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2

To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C.

Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Alfa Romeo 6C 2008 Land Rover LR2
Make Alfa Romeo Land Rover
Model 6C LR2
Year Released 1950 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 3201 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 105 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 96 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 165 km/hour 199 km/hour
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 2180 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 77 L 70 L