1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 69 L |