1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fisker |
Model | 6C | Karma |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 36 L |