1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka.
Because 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ka |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 40 L |